We opinion the latest section court’s offer regarding summary judgment de- novo

In general, i comment a community court’s award out of attorney’s fees to own a keen punishment from discernment

Condition Univ. v. Riley, 74 F.three dimensional 960, 963 (9th Cir.1996). Inside the looking at a give away from realization judgment, we need to influence, seeing evidence throughout the light very good towards the nonmoving cluster, whether or not there clearly was people legitimate issue of situation fact and you will if the fresh new section court correctly applied the appropriate substantive law. Discover Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome Locations, 116 F.three dimensional 830, 834 (9th Cir.), revised from the 125 F.3d 1281 (9th Cir.1997). New preclusive effectation of a prior view try a question of rules subject to de novo comment. FDIC v. Jenson (For the re also Jenson), 980 F.2d 1254, 1256 (9th Cir.1992). Find Wing v. Asarco Inc., 114 F.three-dimensional 986, 988 (9th Cir.1997). Although not, we decide whether or not the district judge applied a proper legal basic de- novo. Select Velarde v. Rate Registration Factory, Inc., 105 F.3d 1313, 1318 (9th Cir.1997). And you can, i review one section of legal data and you can legal interpretation, and this data throughout the region court’s decision out of attorney’s costs, de- novo. Look for Corder v. Doorways, 104 F.three-dimensional 247, 249 (9th Cir.1996).

When Freddie Mac registered their states inside the personal bankruptcy either Siegel otherwise the brand new trustee might have elevated arguments. Continue reading →